My name is Muna and I trust a bitch, yes bred Rottweiler that taking advantage of the IV Centenary of Don Quixote tell you my adventures in chapters, against legislators and administrators. Unfortunately
Majadahonda live in a residential surveillance cameras equipped for continuous recording, so my animal rights and my freedoms are even more constrained.
says the local press, that His Excellency will ban the entry of dogs in public parks. I do not care because my head, "he does not want to call him master," I never been there. As has long time I walk through the field. Sorry for my colleagues, as pipicanes, "of course will most inappropriate name, so there is cacacanes should be called - are installed within the grounds of the park. If they do so, more crap on the sidewalks. Step
list of my abilities I was born sociales.Desde taught me well, I pee in the gutter and my family has always been collecting my poop, even in the field, as is obligatory. Look at me in the eye, - why I remember this phrase? - This is true, and I can prove it!.
A few days after publication in the Official Gazette Decree 287/2002 of March 22 for possession of dangerous dogs, I asked "my papers "delivered in the following documents
Excellency
-Certificate of Recognition center, which proves my head that can me, but really, after time, I have doubts that he can now dominate.
-insurance policy covering € 180,000, more than legal what if I get angry and attacked a major character.
-rabies vaccination certificate (Madrid)
-Card Official Register of Companion Animals, also of the Community, with its number chip.
-card race pedigree and family history.! You see what it does.
-primer veterinary vaccination and deworming of dogs.
-criminal record certificate, so far from my head, not mine.
All these "papers" that are worth a few sacks of feed American, leads the head in a plastic case around your neck so that, at the same time, he also credits his "social purity." This has an advantage because when you walk out with me and the mere fact behave, testifies to never having been in prison, be psychologically stable, and possess sufficient strength, at least for the time being all three. Bitch boasts and tells his friends that he is the legal person in the world.
I have news of a foreign leader who arrested him driving long slightly .... "Taken." Well if he were residing in Spain - not to give clues, could not pass the test to take a race like mine, it should accompany psychological aptitude certificate in addition to proving criminal record certificate has not been involved in any type of crime . Could that be why I've seen on the news that the president down the helicopter with a small dog?.
The muzzle has no name. It is as if to avoid having partner abuse, and before occurrence of the event, anyone who had a specific type force him to be handcuffed. The boss says that half of Spain would end up with hands clasped as The Lute.
After more than two years back to ask me the "roles", omitting the letter that have been lost, and for more joke, attached some pictures to color with all breeds of "dangerous dogs." Just need a foot print that says, "Wanted." As my race is included, I grind their teeth. ! Then say I have bad character and bite, but put yourself in my place!
verbally inform me that my "papers" are often misplaced, - another obvious,! For this are the papers -. Luckily my boss, who knows well the administration for years been suffering from "managed" in its day, called by His Excellency "Acknowledgment" of all papers delivered, and so, for over two years I have been legalized in order to continue biting on behalf of the City.
This poster reminds me that in the eighteenth century, put the citizens of Madrid always so witty and protesters on the walls of the foundling, - then with an infant mortality rate of 80/90% -, saying: "Here children die by the State. "
It Excellency website gives a clue to what happens. Just as there is "Municipal Census Pets, our races are " Record (hands up), Municipal Potentially Dangerous Dog ". So my boss spends all day giving explanations to children when they ask their moms and dads: Does this dog bite?, he answered:" No small that bite are the legislators who should lead a mask as Anthony Hopkins in the role of Hannibal Lecter. " 
I'm seriously considering fleeing to Madrid, illegal and pass me biting into the soft parts lawmakers Carrera de San Jerónimo, so Fans launch "ukases" without thinking, - I say they do not know, "run, run, after I booted the chip to avoid compromising the Chief.
CHAPTER II. of comparative law and other considerations. Lean
carefully to what the law says the state of California, USA on potentially dangerous dogs. ! That is the life barking. Without prejudice, analyze and give the dog-sac, and even if you do not penalize bite in certain circumstances, depending on where or if provoked.
After reading this good law affirm I am not anti-American. I gather that in any case, I can have some kind of "Bushism", going as Michael Moore.
31602. The term "potentially dangerous dog" may have any of the three following meanings:
(A) Any dog \u200b\u200bthat, unprovoked, has demonstrated on two separate occasions during the past 36 months such behavior that has required a defensive action by any person to prevent harm to their physical integrity, being both the person and the dog was property of the owner or keeper of the dog.
(b) Any dog \u200b\u200bthat, unprovoked, bites a person and cause a mild injury, as defined in Section 31604.
(c) Any dog \u200b\u200bthat, unprovoked, has killed, seriously bitten or attacked and otherwise injured a domestic animal on two separate occasions during the past 36 months, while two out of the property owner or keeper of the dog.
31603. The term "cruel dog" may have any of the three following meanings:
(a) Any dog \u200b\u200bseized under the provisions of Section 599aa of the Penal Code and whose owner or keeper has been convicted under the provisions of subarticle (a) of Section 597.5 of the Penal Code.
(b) Any dog \u200b\u200bthat, unprovoked, cause injury or kill an aggressive to a human.
(c) Any dog \u200b\u200bpreviously qualified and currently registered as a potentially dangerous dog, which continues to demonstrate the behavior described in Section 31602 after its owner or guardian has been notified of this qualification, or be maintained against the provisions of Section 31641, 31642 or 31643.
31626.
(a) may not be declared potentially dangerous or cruel to any dog \u200b\u200bthat has caused an injury or damage to a person who, at the time of suffering such injury or damage, was deliberately invading the property occupied by the owner or guardian dog or other unlawful acts committed against it, or was provoking, tormenting, abusing or attacking the dog or was committing or attempting to commit a crime. Not be declared potentially dangerous or cruel to any dog was protecting or defending an unwarranted attack on a person who was found nearby. Not be declared potentially dangerous or cruel to any dog \u200b\u200bwhich caused injury or damage to a pet at the time of suffering such injury or damage, was provoking, tormenting, abusing or attacking the dog.
I have to emphasize that, except for error, unless it is collected in a subsequent regulations do not know, nothing is said about taking the dog with a muzzle to prevent bites,! That obvious!, Nor to classify races appointment as dangerous dogs, from which I gather that American policymakers, at least those in California, are smart.
......... In Spain ! Strip!. ! Prior muzzle racist butt! . Why not designated as potentially dangerous dogs of other breeds, including German Shepherd if they have attacked more than one person?. Will the legislature seen many films of Rin Tin Tin? . Clearly then English legislators plug the loophole and are cured in health and also as potentially dangerous dogs suspected to anyone with a weight and a certain chest diameter, so go crazy with other heads of dogs as they have to monitor your pets weight, muscle growth and does not belong to those identified in the law. How will this madness included among the "potentially dangerous" to the San Bernardo buenazo?. And if so, can not be a first step to implement the prohibition?. ! From these and mistrust!.
After much philosophizing in Spain the only "standard" well done that I know is the Duval, and I did not know legislators. Are you with me?.
Why not penalized piggy owners and compliance with at my head, they were harassed and persecuted taxes?. When HE will reward with Rosette and appointment to the dogs more educated and compliant of the standard?. In this country alone is rewarded and the photos come out in local journals, the political rule and the dogs of "races beautiful."
What rights does the dog "potentially dangerous" in Majadahonda?. "Just a walk tied, muzzled, and roast him on taxes and fees?.
As a last thought I say that, as we are in a country where those who succeed are those who have more things, whether property or infinite names, I can infer that I am more important than some who have the initials only two "fish" PP, His Majesty the King by the RD cited and published in the BOE, I gave my my, title of nobility, honorary and life, to lead a "P" more in my illustrious names as the most three, "PPP "(Bitch Potentially Hazardous).
blasphemous not on the muzzle will not let me!. ! Country !.... I would say Forges.! Wow that human life!.
